TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
Subject:Ebonic Plague From:Alisa Dean <Alisa -dot- Dean -at- MCI -dot- COM> Date:Mon, 23 Dec 1996 13:19:00 -0700
Dec. 20, Bryan Westbrook wrote:
>This entire decision is indicative of the welfare mentality. Its
>proponents do not want to make the effort to learn to speak properly, so
>they want to have their laziness validated. Listen to anyone on the news
>talking "ebonics" and see if you can take them as seriously as someone =
>is talking proper English.
If I remember correctly, this discussion started
as a question (maybe a rhetorical question) regarding whether or not
Ebonics will be a language form that we as technical communicators
will be addressing. As such, I felt it was valid question, although
I would consider it in the same category as whether it is necessary
to write in any other non-American English language (this is showing
my undyed ethno-centricity roots). In my mind this would be dependent
on the requirements of the audience and the client. That's all. I
would let the academicians fight out whether Ebonics is valid a
language or not.
Please, guys. This is not the place to start airing personal
political/ethnic views, especially when it includes gross generalizations.
Sr. Technical Writer
alisa -dot- dean -at- mci -dot- com