Re: Ph.D.'s -Back to the Topic

Subject: Re: Ph.D.'s -Back to the Topic
From: "Wayne J. Douglass" <wayned -at- VERITY -dot- COM>
Date: Tue, 31 Dec 1996 14:34:22 -0800

At 09:29 AM 12/31/96 -0800, Bill Sullivan wrote:
>Getting back to the original question of whether or not to list one's
>Ph.D. as a credential when tech writing --

>I believe most (but not all) people hire technical writers because
>they believe their product requires simple or non-technical
>explaining. I am not sure that Ph.D.s have a lock on writing simply
>or non technically.

>I ran a word count on Cathy's original post. She used 416 words to
>ask her fairly simple question. And Tim Altom, whose firm is called
>Simply Written, used 527 words to reply. Go figure. And happy new
>year.

And this proves?

--Wayne Douglass
===================================================
Connecting People with Information
Verity, Inc. Email: wayned -at- verity -dot- com
894 Ross Drive Telephone: 408-542-2139
Sunnyvale, CA 94089 Facsimile: 408-542-2040
===================================================


Previous by Author: Re: Irony Dectectors (WAS: Ph.D.'s)
Next by Author: Re: Do's and Don'ts
Previous by Thread: Re: Ph.D.'s -Back to the Topic
Next by Thread: Online Docs on SCO UNIX


What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:

Sponsored Ads


Sponsored Ads