Re: Management disagreement RE: HTML

Subject: Re: Management disagreement RE: HTML
From: Stephanie Holland <SLHOLLAND -at- MICRON -dot- COM>
Date: Thu, 9 Jan 1997 14:10:52 -0700

Thanks for this suggestion. I should have mentioned that our intranet
has been around for more than a year. My group has always written
documents in HTML and published them to our intranet server. This
manager I refer to is new and for some reason wants to change things.

Stephanie

>----------
>From: Bill Bledsoe[SMTP:bill -at- envision -dot- com]
>Sent: Thursday, January 09, 1997 12:48 PM
>To: SLHOLLAND -at- micron -dot- com
>Cc: TECHWR-L -at- LISTSERV -dot- OKSTATE -dot- EDU
>Subject: Re: Management disagreement RE: HTML
>
>Stephanie,
>
>My plan of attack here would be to build documents directly in HTML,
>and
>tell him and his group that they can do what the like with those files.
>
>
>The typical intranet is started more or less on the sly... without a
>lot
>of formal approval, groups typically just start doing it and then
>hammer out the process as it goes along.
>
>In a company the size and position of Micron, you should have the
>freedom and the technology to react to this. I think it is simple.
>Get
>your documents to HTML. Convert them yourself to HTML before he and
>his
>group has a chance to see them or do anything with them. Use Help to
>HTML, Internet Assistant, Web Publisher... just crank them out in your
>group. As tech comms, you're going to have a better idea of how to
>make the document usable right? :-) So, in the immortal words of
>Bela Karolyi... "you can do it!" By publishing in HTML as a
>"value-added option" you will circumvent the need he's running around
>saying exists. Before he realizes it, his group will return to the
>"file manager" role, and you again will be in control of content. And
>from your email, that's what it sounds like you want.
>
>Hate to be so devious... but if you look at the brief but extensively
>documented history of intranets... they almost all have an element of
>"corporate creativity" in their inception. You're now at the "turf
>battle stage" and in a "battle," you do what it takes, within the
>guidelines of business ethics of course. Again, you're group's efforts
>
>are simply to provide a "value-added"... nothing more.
>
>My $.02 worth... any other thoughts from anyone out there? D. Dimock,
>haven't heard from you in a while... I think you'd have something to
>say
>here... Besides... we'd all like to know about the happenings in El
>Segundo :-)
>
>cheers,
>--
>************************************************************
>Bill Bledsoe
>Technical Communicator
>St. Louis, MO
>bill -at- envision -dot- com or intlidox -at- anet-stl -dot- com
>webmaster: St. Louis Chapter - STC <www.stc.org/region6/stl>
> Envision <www.envision.com>
> My Resume(if you're so inclined)<www.anet-stl.com/~intlidox>
>
>"The Internet is the first thing that
>humanity has built that humanity doesn't
>understand," Eric Schmidt, CTO Sun 10/18/96
>*************************************************************
>

TECHWR-L (Technical Communication) List Information: To send a message
to 2500+ readers, e-mail to TECHWR-L -at- LISTSERV -dot- OKSTATE -dot- EDU -dot- Send commands
to LISTSERV -at- LISTSERV -dot- OKSTATE -dot- EDU (e.g. HELP or SIGNOFF TECHWR-L).
Search the archives at http://www.documentation.com/ or search and
browse the archives at http://listserv.okstate.edu/archives/techwr-l.html


Previous by Author: Management disagreement RE: HTML
Next by Author: Re: Management disagreement RE: HTML
Previous by Thread: Re: Management disagreement RE: HTML
Next by Thread: Re: Management disagreement RE: HTML


What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:

Sponsored Ads


Sponsored Ads