Re[2]: Small Talk

Subject: Re[2]: Small Talk
From: Arlen -dot- P -dot- Walker -at- JCI -dot- COM
Date: Mon, 13 Jan 1997 13:26:00 -0600

If memory serves me right, Small Talk is from the Applie/Mac stable.
Anything from there, I feel, is easy to learn -- ar at least it looks
like that. All the best!

Your memory fails you. Though they may have a common ancestor in Xerox,
that's about as close as it gets. Apple doesn't own, and never did, an
implementation of SmallTalk, though there are two that run on Macs.

I looked at SmallTalk once. Perhaps I'm just too encumbered with procedural
languages like C but it looked quite strange and difficult to me. Give it a
try and see what you think.

Have fun,
Chief Managing Director In Charge, Department of Redundancy Department
DNRC 224

Arlen -dot- P -dot- Walker -at- JCI -dot- Com
In God we trust; all others must provide data.
Opinions expressed are mine and mine alone.
If JCI had an opinion on this, they'd hire someone else to deliver it.

TECHWR-L (Technical Communication) List Information: To send a message
to 2500+ readers, e-mail to TECHWR-L -at- LISTSERV -dot- OKSTATE -dot- EDU -dot- Send commands
Search the archives at or search and
browse the archives at

Previous by Author: Re[2]: Meddling Manager Mystifies Minions
Next by Author: Re: military time terminology
Previous by Thread: Re: Small Talk
Next by Thread: Re: Small Talk

What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:

Sponsored Ads

Sponsored Ads