TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
Subject:Re: Entry Level position From:KLShaw <KLShaw -at- IX -dot- NETCOM -dot- COM> Date:Tue, 14 Jan 1997 11:24:53 -0800
In terms of complexity and required expertise, your position may not be
entry level. But I think most employers would still consider someone
with less than one year of experience on the job "entry level." Why not
wait until your annual review/one-year anniversary to explore the
possibility of a position upgrade? After a full year on the job, and
especially with a positive performance review, you would be in a much
stronger position to request an upgrade.
One word of caution -- some employers will continue to define certain
positions as entry level, regardless of the incumbent's responsibilities
or skills, simply because they want to maintain the entry-level salary.
I ran into this problem in my first editorial job. After three years in
an "entry-level" position, I was no longer an entry-level editor doing
entry-level work. But the employer refused to consider upgrading the
position or even raising my salary, so I moved on. Hope you will have
Words & Graphics Inc.
KLShaw -at- ix -dot- netcom -dot- com