TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
Subject:Re: Readability and point size From:Mitch Berg <mberg -at- IS -dot- COM> Date:Tue, 14 Jan 1997 21:41:58 -0600
Jill Burgchardt wrote:
> Does anyone have any statistics or know of any articles regarding use of different point
> sizes for readability? Specifically, is bigger always better (hardcopy documentation)?
Articles? Who has time to research?
Seriously, the answer, as to most questions, is "It Depends". A few
* Run a few samples by sample audience members at various type sizes.
* A rule of thumb is: you should be able to type the alphabet twice on a
line of text.
If you can type it more than twice, increase your size. If you can't
get thru twice,
crank it down a notch.
> The 12-point standard proposed for body text on our documentation seems to waste
> a lot of space. Since our audience is primarily scientists, we think they'd be just as
> comfortable if we dropped it to 9 or 10 point. (We assume they read plenty of technical
> stuff at smaller font sizes.)
Ugh. 10 points is bad enough - nine points should make even a sleazy
Know your audience, and know your design considerations. Any older
engineers? Tiny type might not agree with 'em.