TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
Subject:Re: Readability and point size From:Don Smith <dsmith -at- ACCESSBEYOND -dot- COM> Date:Wed, 15 Jan 1997 07:19:42 EST
Your thoughts follow ours. We have been using 9.5 points with New
Century School Book font for our manuals during the last 3 or 4 years.
This is with a page size of 5.5 by 8.5 inches. We have not receieved
any complaints of "the printing is too small", up to now.
For larger (8.5 x 11) manuals we are using (not my idea!) 12 points.
Very best regards,
Sr. Technical Writer
______________________________ Reply Separator _________________________________
Subject: Readability and point size
Author: Jill Burgchardt <jburgcha -at- PESTILENCE -dot- FTC -dot- NRCS -dot- USDA -dot- GOV> at INTERNET
Date: 1/14/97 5:32 PM
Does anyone have any statistics or know of any articles regarding use of
sizes for readability? Specifically, is bigger always better (hardcopy
The 12-point standard proposed for body text on our documentation seems to waste
a lot of space. Since our audience is primarily scientists, we think they'd be
comfortable if we dropped it to 9 or 10 point. (We assume they read plenty of
stuff at smaller font sizes.)
Does any research support our perspective? Please send your responses to
jburgcha -at- pestilence -dot- ftc -dot- nrcs -dot- usda -dot- gov