Re: Word instead of FrameMaker

Subject: Re: Word instead of FrameMaker
From: Bob Morrisette <robert -dot- morrisette -at- EBAY -dot- SUN -dot- COM>
Date: Wed, 15 Jan 1997 09:11:39 -0800

From: Tan Joo Khim <jktan -at- CTHOST -dot- CT -dot- CREAF -dot- COM

>Hi, tech whirlers,

>Pls advise on the pros and cons of using Word instead of FrameMaker for
>printed documentation.

>From our point of view, the immediate benefit of using Word instead of
>FrameMaker are:
>1. Currently, there are no Asian versions of FM.

snip/

Frame sells a Japanese version for the Mac.
See the current Adobe Frame newsletter for details.

Bob Morrisette
writer -at- sabu -dot- EBay -dot- sun -dot- com

TECHWR-L (Technical Communication) List Information: To send a message
to 2500+ readers, e-mail to TECHWR-L -at- LISTSERV -dot- OKSTATE -dot- EDU -dot- Send commands
to LISTSERV -at- LISTSERV -dot- OKSTATE -dot- EDU (e.g. HELP or SIGNOFF TECHWR-L).
Search the archives at http://www.documentation.com/ or search and
browse the archives at http://listserv.okstate.edu/archives/techwr-l.html


Previous by Author: Re: How do we measure writer efficiency?
Next by Author: Re: Readability and point size
Previous by Thread: Re: Word instead of FrameMaker
Next by Thread: Re: Word instead of FrameMaker


What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:

Sponsored Ads


Sponsored Ads