Re: Editors

Subject: Re: Editors
From: Dianne Martin <MartinD -at- TRAVIS -dot- TYC -dot- STATE -dot- TX -dot- US>
Date: Fri, 17 Jan 1997 14:22:00 PST

I have to agree with getting the editors involved early. In fact, I have
_never_ had a real editor to proof my stuff. However, I do enlist the help
of anyone at the company with an aptitude for the English language and I do
so on the first draft. Most of the time, this person has not seen the
product (I write software user docs) nor will that person have the luxury of
running the software while going through the first draft. If I can make the
manual understandable to the editor under those circumstances, I pray that
my users will be even more enlightened while actually seeing the software.

Of course, I do run the second, third & final drafts by the person to get
final changes. But time is always working against major revisions by that
time. If I don't get the problems ironed out early, they stay until the
next version is released (sigh!)

Dianne Martin

Stacey wrote:
My frustration is in not knowing the
subject well enough to offer suggestions. It seems that, like my
students, some writers are reluctant to try to improve a document
that's already written because that's over. By the time I get it,
read it and approach them with comments, they're already onto another
one. I can understand their reluctance, it just is then more
difficult for me to do my job. That's why I'd, ideally, like to be
included earlier.

TECHWR-L (Technical Communication) List Information: To send a message
to 2500+ readers, e-mail to TECHWR-L -at- LISTSERV -dot- OKSTATE -dot- EDU -dot- Send commands
Search the archives at or search and
browse the archives at

Previous by Author: Re: Tech writing jobs, Intuit San Diego
Next by Author: PageMaker printing problems
Previous by Thread: Re: Editors
Next by Thread: List for contractors?

What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:

Sponsored Ads

Sponsored Ads