TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
It has been gratifying to see that my question regarding alternative
titles for technical writers spawned quite a range of discussion.
Thanks to everybody who generously supplied me with suggestions. My
supervisor got a real kick out of them! I'll let you know what the
powers-that-be decide . . .
In the meantime, I have a question regarding the citing of sources.
What are everyone's thoughts on this matter? Hypothetically, if a
technical writer draws on another document for information in a manual,
is it sufficient to supply a bibliography with the manual or does every
individual fact need to be cited in some way? How have other people
dealt with this kind of situation? I must say that I have yet to
encounter footnotes in a manual or in technical reference material but
then I haven't been at this long enough to say with confidence that my
experience is definitive.
Curious to read your thoughts on this matter,
(mbarwick -at- rci -dot- rogers -dot- com)