TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
Subject:Re: European vs. American paper sizes From:Stuart Burnfield <slb -at- FS -dot- COM -dot- AU> Date:Wed, 22 Jan 1997 14:18:50 +0800
"Wayne J. Douglass" <wayned -at- VERITY -dot- COM> wrote:
> At 04:58 PM 1/9/97 -0600, Geoff Hart wrote:
> > The only drawback to this approach is that you're not
> > making optimal use of white space on either version, and
> > white space should be designed, not an accident. On the
> > other hand, the paper sizes are close enough that this
> > shouldn't pose a serious problem.
> If your idea of "optimal use of white space" is cramming as much type on a
> page as you can, then Geoff is right. Otherwise, it's a simple design
> consideration that savvy designers handle every day.
I doubt Geoff meant this. I expect he's saying that "optimal use of white
space" for one paper size would not be optimal for another. An intermediate
design might be tolerable, but would not be optimal for either. One size
doesn't fit all.
Stuart Burnfield (slb -at- fs -dot- com -dot- au) Voice: +61 9 328 8288
Senior Stunt Borg
Functional Software Pty Ltd Fax: +61 9 328 8616