TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
Subject:Re: Justifying a F/T editor? From:Gail Taylor <gtaylor -at- ISLANDNET -dot- COM> Date:Wed, 22 Jan 1997 16:08:38 -0800
>Any ideas re: at what point it makes sense to have a full-time editor?
>Are there any
>standard metrics for the ratio of editors to writers, requirements for
>an editor based on
>pages of documentation, or other measures?
I worked as a technical writer and editor in a publications group with a
manager (who did some writing) and four other writers. As writer, I was
responsible for the installation and release notes. As editor, I worked very
closely with two of the writers, who were quite junior. I edited for the
department, consulted with editors at two other sites to agree on style
issues, and maintained the style guide.
Hope this helps -
Gail Taylor (gtaylor -at- islandnet -dot- com
WM Wordsworth & More Ltd. tel: 250 746-7092
2285 Mattin Road, R.R.1 fax: 250 746-1837
Cowichan Bay, B.C. V0R 1N0