TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
Subject:"Good" Web Pages From:mmarkley -at- MICRON -dot- COM Date:Wed, 29 Jan 1997 13:54:38 MST
I would like to solicit your professional opinions on a
question that I have been wrestling with:
What is "good" when it comes to Web pages/documentation?
In other words, if you were to list some specific criteria
for judging the quality of Web pages/documentation, what
would some of those criteria be? Or what peeves you when
you use the Web?
Just to get you started, here are a few criteria of my
own: Good Web pages (1) are easy to navigate, (2) contain
timely and useful information, (3) contain mechanisms to
measure their effectiveness (i.e., tracking features).
What have I missed?
I understand that other sources are available for this, but
I want to get my information from all of you--the world's
practicing technical communicators--not from a book on how
to create whiz-bang web pages, or from a magazine whose
primary goal is to *sell* magazines).
Thanks for your input. I'd be happy to post a summary
if anyone else is interested in this topic.
mmarkley -at- micron -dot- com
Micron Technology, Inc.