TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
Subject:Re: Too many tables in documentation From:"Wayne J. Douglass" <wayned -at- VERITY -dot- COM> Date:Thu, 30 Jan 1997 10:20:23 -0800
At 12:22 PM 1/30/97 -0400, Heidi Margenau wrote:
>We are documenting a payroll/hr software application which uses many
>windows, tabs and pages. Each window (or screen) has to be documented for
>paper and online help reasons (we use doc-to-help). To define what's on
>each screen, we first have a field and description table and then later in
>the section we have a procedural table (step/action) that guides the user
>through any action that has to be carried out for that screen. Since our
>documentation is somewhat screen driven, it is turning into all tables. We
>have looked through all types of different documentation related to our
>field, and no one seems to be running into this problem. (Their procedures,
>if any, are buried within paragraphs and field/description screens are also
>described in paragraph format.)
>Any feedback on how to solve this problem, or if you know the current
>trends for field/description plus procedural tables within user guides
>would be greatly appreciated
So, what's the problem? Either you use tables or you don't.
Verity, Inc. Email: wayned -at- verity -dot- com
894 Ross Drive Telephone: 408-542-2139
Sunnyvale, CA 94089 Facsimile: 408-542-2040
Connecting People with Information: http://www.verity.com