Re: (Fwd) Re: Minimalism

Subject: Re: (Fwd) Re: Minimalism
From: Don Smith <dsmith -at- ACCESSBEYOND -dot- COM>
Date: Thu, 30 Jan 1997 13:30:03 EST

T. Mazza

I believe that Robert was talking about "paper" matchbooks which used
to be given with cigarettes. (Remember them?) The original had the
striker on the front. For the reasons that were given here, the
striker strip *was* put on the back, so that you could remove the
match from the front, but had to turn the pack around to the back to
strike the match. While not foolproof, it was (is?) much safer.

Don Smith


______________________________ Reply Separator _________________________________
Subject: (Fwd) Re: Minimalism
Author: "T. Mazza" <tmazz -at- KODIAK -dot- ADAMS -dot- COM> at INTERNET
Date: 1/30/97 12:05 PM


Robert,

if you put the abrasive strip on the back and don't close the box before
turning it over to strike, all your matches will fall out. (Your consumer
wouldn't be very happy.) So that design wouldn't work very well, would it?
However, if you put the strip of the front, you will still have your fire
hazard.




--- Forwarded mail from Robert Plamondon <robert -at- PLAMONDON -dot- COM>

Date: Thu, 30 Jan 1997 07:28:35 PST
Reply-To: Robert Plamondon <robert -at- PLAMONDON -dot- COM>
From: Robert Plamondon <robert -at- PLAMONDON -dot- COM>
Subject: Re: Minimalism
To: TECHWR-L -at- LISTSERV -dot- OKSTATE -dot- EDU

The "close cover before striking message" can itself be reduced to zero
by redesigning the matchbook cover. If you put the abrasive strip on
the back side, rather than the front, the matchbook cover works as an
effective shield whether you close it or not, thus eliminating the
need for any message at all.

Really good intuitive design eliminates the need for a lot of documentation.
So does less-intuitive design if it's part of a universal standard.
I've never seen a piece of documentation telling the user to raise the
little red flag in his mailbox when he wants the carrier to pick up
a letter.

-- Robert
--
Robert Plamondon, High-Tech Technical Writing, Inc.
36475 Norton Creek Road * Blodgett * Oregon * 97326
robert -at- plamondon -dot- com * (541) 453-5841 * Fax: (541) 453-4139

TECHWR-L (Technical Communication) List Information: To send a message
to 2500+ readers, e-mail to TECHWR-L -at- LISTSERV -dot- OKSTATE -dot- EDU -dot- Send commands
to LISTSERV -at- LISTSERV -dot- OKSTATE -dot- EDU (e.g. HELP or SIGNOFF TECHWR-L).
Search the archives at http://www.documentation.com/ or search and
browse the archives at http://listserv.okstate.edu/archives/techwr-l.html


---End of forwarded mail from Robert Plamondon <robert -at- PLAMONDON -dot- COM>

--
(In God I trust; all others must provide data.)

Theodora Mazza Mechanical Dynamics, Inc.
tmazz -at- adams -dot- com Ann Arbor, Michigan
(313) 913-2537

TECHWR-L (Technical Communication) List Information: To send a message
to 2500+ readers, e-mail to TECHWR-L -at- LISTSERV -dot- OKSTATE -dot- EDU -dot- Send commands
to LISTSERV -at- LISTSERV -dot- OKSTATE -dot- EDU (e.g. HELP or SIGNOFF TECHWR-L).
Search the archives at http://www.documentation.com/ or search and
browse the archives at http://listserv.okstate.edu/archives/techwr-l.html

TECHWR-L (Technical Communication) List Information: To send a message
to 2500+ readers, e-mail to TECHWR-L -at- LISTSERV -dot- OKSTATE -dot- EDU -dot- Send commands
to LISTSERV -at- LISTSERV -dot- OKSTATE -dot- EDU (e.g. HELP or SIGNOFF TECHWR-L).
Search the archives at http://www.documentation.com/ or search and
browse the archives at http://listserv.okstate.edu/archives/techwr-l.html


Previous by Author: Re[2]: Titles vs. Duties
Next by Author: Re[2]: Intuitive (was Minimalism)
Previous by Thread: (Fwd) Re: Minimalism
Next by Thread: (Fwd) Re: Minimalism


What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:

Sponsored Ads


Sponsored Ads