Re[2]: Intuitive vs Familiar (was minimalism)

Subject: Re[2]: Intuitive vs Familiar (was minimalism)
From: Arlen -dot- P -dot- Walker -at- JCI -dot- COM
Date: Fri, 31 Jan 1997 16:47:00 -0600

My point was that "intuitive" is not used to describe "intuitive"
things but to describe "familiar"(to some) things and that we
would all be better off if we used "familiar" instead of "intuitive"
because we would recognize that what is familiar to one group
is not necessarily familiar to another. "Intuitive" seems
to denote some universal, human knowledge or process.

The problem is that "familiar" brings its own baggage to the party. I'm not
"familiar" with a Ferrari Testarossa, but I bet I could drive it if you gave
me one. ;{>}

As Dan pointed out, the process we're describing is neither intuition nor
familiarity, but inference. But somehow, calling an interface "inferrable"
just doesn't cut it. (Did anyone else out there gag on that word?) Until I
can find a better one, "intuitive" seems to fit better than the rest.

Have fun,
Chief Managing Director In Charge, Department of Redundancy Department
DNRC 224

Arlen -dot- P -dot- Walker -at- JCI -dot- Com
In God we trust; all others must provide data.
Opinions expressed are mine and mine alone.
If JCI had an opinion on this, they'd hire someone else to deliver it.

TECHWR-L (Technical Communication) List Information: To send a message
to 2500+ readers, e-mail to TECHWR-L -at- LISTSERV -dot- OKSTATE -dot- EDU -dot- Send commands
Search the archives at or search and
browse the archives at

Previous by Author: Re[2]: Minimalism
Next by Author: Re: Tech Doc in...
Previous by Thread: Re: Intuitive vs Familiar (was minimalism)
Next by Thread: Re: TECHWR-L Digest - 29 Jan 1997 to 30 Jan 1997

What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:

Sponsored Ads

Sponsored Ads