Re: Re[2]: our listowner

Subject: Re: Re[2]: our listowner
From: Kim Keegan <keegan -at- EXPLORERS -dot- COM>
Date: Tue, 4 Feb 1997 08:23:48 -0800

Mike Bygrave wrote:
> Is there any way of being a subscriber to this list without being referred as a
> TechWhirler or a member of the Techster gang?

To which Don Smith agreed:
> I hope someone else would final say something about this.
> I perfer to be called a tech writer, not other cute things.

Gee whiz, someone starting their message with "Hello fellow TechWhirlers" (or other
variations) is just a salutation, or rather a casual salutation. I agree that this
list is for professional issues, but that doesn't mean we can't be casually cordial in
our greetings and salutations.

Happy Tuesday, everyone!

Just my opinion, balancing on the edge of being off-topic!
Kim Keegan | keegan -at- explorers -dot- com

TECHWR-L (Technical Communication) List Information: To send a message
to 2500+ readers, e-mail to TECHWR-L -at- LISTSERV -dot- OKSTATE -dot- EDU -dot- Send commands
Search the archives at or search and
browse the archives at

Previous by Author: Resumes and SMEs, Years v. Years'
Next by Author: Re: business cards
Previous by Thread: Re[2]: our listowner
Next by Thread: White space

What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:

Sponsored Ads