TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
Subject:Re: Contracting moral dilemma From:Len Olszewski <saslpo -at- UNX -dot- SAS -dot- COM> Date:Wed, 5 Feb 1997 17:54:33 GMT
In article <Pine -dot- SUN -dot- 3 -dot- 91 -dot- 970205075722 -dot- 25153E-100000 -at- crl -dot- crl -dot- com>, The Tech
Writer <techwrtr -at- CRL -dot- COM> writes:
|> I have successfully bid on a fixed-price contract.
|> My potential dilemma is: what if I spend a lot less hours on the project
|> than I calculated for my bid?
I suggest you keep the money. Fixed price bidding is a two-way street.
Beyond that, I suggest you bid for follow-on work with this company, and
kick in a rebate if they take you up on it.
In the meantime, isn't nice to have some extra for contingencies? You
might do more for this client than you bid, so the price covers your
real time. Then you'd probably get follow-on work for sure.
Len Olszewski, "You've got to jump off cliffs all the time and
saslpo -at- unx -dot- sas -dot- com build your wings on the way down." Ray Bradbury
919-677-8000 x7487 *********My opinions; you go get your own.********