TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
Subject:Re: Contracting moral dilemma From:"Barbara J. Philbrick" <caslonsvcs -at- JUNO -dot- COM> Date:Wed, 5 Feb 1997 10:40:00 PST
On Wed, 5 Feb 1997 08:03:09 -0800 The Tech Writer <techwrtr -at- CRL -dot- COM>
>My potential dilemma is: what if I spend a lot less hours on the project
>than I calculated for my bid? It is a fixed bid, but I still based it
>on >how many hours I thought it would take. If I go over the amount of
>time I estimated, I certainly wouldn't expect to be paid more...but
>return whatever portion that I didn't work for?
I usually split the difference between myself and my client. I look at it
as a bonus for taking the risk of a fixed price contract (don't worry -
you'll lose money on enough of them that you won't feel guilty after a
while). None of my clients has ever complained about being charged less
(even from a paperwork standpoint; they just mark the P.O. complete).
The plus side of returning a little to the client is that they think
you're honest and fast.
>Another contract will follow this one. Should I just adjust the other
>contract to offset any unworked-for income on this one?
I never reduce a quote. I'd rather have extra on a quote than have to go
back and beg for more money, even if it's the client's fault that the
project is over the quote.