TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
Subject:Re: Click Language From:Beth Mazur <mazur -at- MAYA -dot- COM> Date:Mon, 10 Feb 1997 16:48:50 -0500
At 4:36 PM -0500 2/10/97, Amy Brown wrote:
>Many of my users are not computer or Windows-proficient. Hence, I
>substituted the phrase "click twice" for "double-click."
Hmm, if I type really fast, I can probably be the first of many responses
that point out that what your users take for "click twice" may not be
interpreted by the OS as a double-click. Usually the latter is defined
in the bowels of the OS as two clicks separated by some small number of
Meanwhile, your naive user may want to make sure they really click twice,
so they click once, pause, and then click again. Voila...two clicks instead
of a "real" double-click.
If it were me, I either would have pointed my users to the Windows tutorial
that explains mouse basics or given them a crash course in the stuff. I
don't see a lot of benefit of straying away from the industry standard
terms in this case.