TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
Subject:Re: Click Language From:"Fernandez, Ray" <AMS!SOLUSPONJ1!rfernand -at- ATTSOL1 -dot- ATTMAIL -dot- COM> Date:Tue, 11 Feb 1997 10:15:00 +0000
>Hi folks --
>Many of my users are not computer or Windows-proficient. Hence, I
>substituted the phrase "click twice" for "double-click."
>Now I'm writing the style manual (after the fact of course -- no time to
>it while I was documenting the new product).
>Any visceral reactions one way or the other?
Usually I would agree with any simplification of a technical (or in this
case semi-technical phrase) -- especially when a simpler phrase already
exists; however, my gut feeling tells me that the majority of users
wouldn't be confused by "double-click". Besides, if they aren't familiar
with "double-click" already, they will more than likely come across in
the near future. It might be in your best interest to introduce your
readers to a phrase that they will encounter quite often.
Here's an idea: why don't you parenthetically define double-click the
first time your readers come across it (assuming of course that they will
be reading from start to finish):