Re: A Far Broader Question

Subject: Re: A Far Broader Question
From: "Wayne J. Douglass" <wayned -at- VERITY -dot- COM>
Date: Wed, 12 Feb 1997 10:18:48 -0800

At 11:36 AM 2/11/97 -0800, Kim Shaw wrote:

>Here's the table of contents from my (little) company's style guide.
>Two caveats: I consider the style guide a work in progress, and it does
>not duplicate guidelines from Chicago -- our major style authority.
>Clear Writing

The standard bromides about clear writing (use the active voice, watch
pronoun antecedents, and blah, blah, blah) are always included in a company
or department style guide, but as I grow older I wonder about their
usefulness. If you're going to cobble together recommendations from various
sources, why not simply use them directly - like the Chicago Manual of Style?

--Wayne Douglass

Verity, Inc. Email: wayned -at- verity -dot- com
894 Ross Drive Telephone: 408-542-2139
Sunnyvale, CA 94089 Facsimile: 408-542-2040
Connecting People with Information:

TECHWR-L (Technical Communication) List Information: To send a message
to 2500+ readers, e-mail to TECHWR-L -at- LISTSERV -dot- OKSTATE -dot- EDU -dot- Send commands
Search the archives at or search and
browse the archives at

Previous by Author: Re: Minimalist documentation
Next by Author: Re: TW Resumes: What to look 4?
Previous by Thread: Re: A Far Broader Question
Next by Thread: A Far Broader Question

What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:

Sponsored Ads