TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
Subject:Re: A Far Broader Question From:"Wayne J. Douglass" <wayned -at- VERITY -dot- COM> Date:Wed, 12 Feb 1997 10:18:48 -0800
At 11:36 AM 2/11/97 -0800, Kim Shaw wrote:
>Here's the table of contents from my (little) company's style guide.
>Two caveats: I consider the style guide a work in progress, and it does
>not duplicate guidelines from Chicago -- our major style authority.
The standard bromides about clear writing (use the active voice, watch
pronoun antecedents, and blah, blah, blah) are always included in a company
or department style guide, but as I grow older I wonder about their
usefulness. If you're going to cobble together recommendations from various
sources, why not simply use them directly - like the Chicago Manual of Style?
Verity, Inc. Email: wayned -at- verity -dot- com
894 Ross Drive Telephone: 408-542-2139
Sunnyvale, CA 94089 Facsimile: 408-542-2040
Connecting People with Information: http://www.verity.com