TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
Subject:Re: Platform of choice From:"Wing, Michael J" <mjwing -at- INGR -dot- COM> Date:Thu, 13 Feb 1997 08:14:22 -0600
>>Yet for some unfathomable reason neither NeXtStep, nor OS/2, nor MacOS
>>has had nearly the success, market share, or acceptance that Windows has
>>had (and still has). This despite their HUGE head start. Please
>Would you like to see the figures for the Windows 95 advertising
>budget? Remember the giant Windows 95 banner hanging from the CN
Are you saying that IBM, Apple and others were precluded from running a
heavy ad campaign?
>(Funny how they never ran pictures of some 60% of those being returned
>to the stores).
First I've heard of this number. I suppose you have some verification
of this percentage or did it just sound like an impressive figure to
>>If Sun's been doing it for years, shouldn't they be dictating
>>the 'de facto' OS standard?
>Problem is, for four years it was almost impossible to buy a PC without
>DOS and Windows 3.x preloaded.
How hard was for the user to reformat the PC and load in their own OS?
>Rather than charge hardware vendors on
>a per-installation basis for their operating systems, like everyone
>else did, Microsoft suckered most of them into a deal by which they got
>all the DOS/Windows licenses free as long as they paid MS a cut of
>every CPU they sent out the door.
UNIX was dumped for free on many universities. For a while students
graduated predisposed to UNIX. Were they suckered?
>When you turn on your PC and an operating system pops up, whether you
>asked for it or not, and you don't know enough about computers to
>change it... then that operating system becomes the 'de facto'
>standard, regardless of how mediocre it is or how many more advanced
>systems are available.
If I'm a user who doesn't know enough to change my OS, what's my
interest in a 'more advanced' OS? If that's the case, I'm probably just
word processing, drawing pictures, entering items in a
database/spreadsheet, or playing games.
>>Pioneering a technology is one thing. Developing it and bringing it
>>successfully to market is another.
>Advertising it is another matter altogether.
Where's the dividing line between bring a product to market and
advertising? Or are you agreeing with me?
>>It looks like developing and controlling the market in operating
>>systems were IBM's, Sun's, Apple's, and Next's to lose. They did!
>They developed and brought to market most of the advances you see in
>Win95 today, but did it years ago. Only problem was, they didn't spend
>huge bucks advertising it to the masses, and the mass media (PC
>Magazine and kin) were completely fixated on Windows... such that
>advanced features like object-oriented shells would get little mentions
>in "news bytes" columns, then be drowned out by big splashy ads for yet
>another Windows virus scanner.
Lot of sour grapes here buddy. Sit on them for a while you may have a
great vintage w(h)ine :^).
> Your friend and mine,
| Michael Wing
| Principal Technical Writer
| Infrastructure Technical Information Development
| Intergraph Corporation
| Huntsville, Alabama
| (205) 730-7250
| mjwing -at- ingr -dot- com