TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
Subject:Re: How not to attract staff From:John Bell <johnbell -at- EROLS -dot- COM> Date:Sat, 15 Feb 1997 15:06:30 -0500
In several management classs I attended I heard of a study
that tracked productivity over time. I wish I new where to find
this study, but here's what they had to say.
Most people are used to working 40-50 hours a week. If you increase
them to 60+ hours a week, you will see a corresponding increase in
productivity for 2-3 weeks. After that, productivity starts slipping
and within 8 weeks from the start you're getting 8 hours of
productivity regardless of how many hours a day (10, 12, 14) the
employee puts in. They start taking longer breaks, take longer to
do typical tasks, and so on.
By the end of 8 weeks, you've lost any advantage in going over
40 hours a week. The employees put in more hours, lose more of
their lives, but you don't get any more work accomplished. Put them
back on 40-hour weeks and within a month they will be back doing
40-hours of work in a 40-hour week.
Prolonged overtime does not equate to more productive output. Short
bursts (crunch time) will produce extra output as intended.