TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
Re: 'Splain me somethin... (was Re: TW Resumes: What to look 4?)
Subject:Re: 'Splain me somethin... (was Re: TW Resumes: What to look 4?) From:"Hamilton, Susan" <shamilton -at- METASOLV -dot- COM> Date:Thu, 20 Feb 1997 09:47:51 -0600
I know it isn't helpful, but I think the whole thing depends. My company
is relatively small (<100), but growing rapidly. Our HR person does a
good job at screening resumes, so I usually only get a few a week.
Consequently, I prefer at least a two-page resume that gives me some
detail, if the person's experience warrants it. If I were in a large
company and soliciting kabillions of resumes, I might prefer a single
A couple of days ago I got two resumes--one was two pages and contained
enough detail that I felt comfortable this person had done the things
she said. The other was one page--the detail was sparse, the format was
OK, and I couldn't really tell that what the person had done was what I
was looking for. I am going to interview them both, but the only reason
I am going to interview the second one is because the way he found our
company was interesting (saw an article about it in a business
magazine), and he lives in Dallas (don't have to pay to fly him in to
I think it's easy to tell when someone has loaded their resume with
buzzwords and doesn't know what they mean. I look for a clean layout
that shows the person knows something about aesthetics, even if it isn't
a unique format (although that certainly catches my eye). In addition, I
look for reasons why I want to interview this person. I am a lot more
likely to call someone in for an interview when their resume says they
"wrote end-user manuals for a PC-based general accounting system
developed in Visual Basic" than someone who's resume says they "wote
I also look more at what the person has done, rather than the tools they
know. If someone knows Word and Frame and other miscellaneous tools, I
can teach them RoboHELP. But it annoys me to no end when someone lists a
tool on their resume and then can't talk intelligently about features of
the tool or what they like about it in comparison to other tools--they
didn't really know the tool, they just used it once a long time
ago--there's a difference.
And just a side note to those who do send resumes electronically--watch
out for your signature line. I once got a resume sent by email. The
automatic signature line had a link to the person's web site. Naturally,
I went to look. The web site was full of the person's adventures, most
of which included scantily-clad women on beaches or backyards or
bedrooms. And there were plenty of pictures to prove it. Needless to
say, that person doesn't work here.
>MetaSolv Software, Inc.
>shamilton -at- metasolv -dot- com
>14900 Landmark Suite 530
>Dallas, Texas 75240
>(972) 239-0623 x172
>From: Mitch Berg[SMTP:mberg -at- IS -dot- COM]
>Sent: Wednesday, February 19, 1997 2:05 PM
>Subject: 'Splain me somethin... (was Re: TW Resumes: What to look 4?)
>Since WHEN is more than one page acceptable? All I EVER hear is, "Get
>it into one page!"
>Even as recently as last year, I have heard of HR people throwing out
>resumes of > one page.
>What's up here?