TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
On Thursday, February 20, 1997 6:00 PM, Dawn
Langley[SMTP:CDLangley -at- AOL -dot- COM] wrote:
> I learned WIN95 today (primarily as an addition to my resume). I understand
> that maintaining an even pace with technology is extremely advantageous
> (especially in this field), but how important is it that I know this
> particular os? I currently vacillate between OS/2 Warp (personal choice),
> 7, and Windows 3.1 but would consider using WIN95 on a quotidian basis if it
> would be worthwhile. Please respond privately so we can avert an online war
> of operating systems.
I think it is very important to know at least the basics of Windows 95,
even if it isn't your 'choice' OS. I guarantee you that you'll need to
use at least one WIN95 application in your job--either documenting it or
using an application under WIN95 for an employer. These days, you've
got to have at least a nodding acquaintance with different software and
environments. I'm not a fan of OS|2, but that isn't the point--I need
to know it so I can work with it.
I don't think this needs to degenerate into an online flame fest,
either, as long as we all recognize that knowing an OS or environment is
different from *liking* it.