TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
Subject:Re: Interview question From:"Laura J. Mulcahy" <laura -at- AGENT -dot- INFODATA -dot- COM> Date:Fri, 21 Feb 1997 01:39:02 -0500
> > an
> > interviewee should always answer such questions with a "false
> > positive,"
> I disagree with your mom's idea of misleading the interviewer. If
> I were asked the weakness question in an interview, I would answer
> as honestly as I could for two reasons: I respect honesty and am
> honest myself, and I would respect the interviewer enough to give
> an honest answer--especially if this person would be my boss later on.
Ack!! I did _not_ mean to imply that someone should be dishonest
with their interviewing tactics. Rather, people should state
something that is a _true_ work disability. My "I take on too much work
to compensate for other people's weaknesses" suggestion would be an
honest admission for some people. I was merely recommending that
you should use potential negatives, and put positive spins on them.
You know, like, "Well, I was an axe murderer, but I got better." ;-)