TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
Subject:Paying for Typos From:Documania <dcma -at- MAIL1 -dot- NAI -dot- NET> Date:Wed, 26 Feb 1997 09:37:33 -0500
I had planned to leave the typo subject alone after our long and vigorous
debate, but it just thrust itself at me again from a new direction.
At a local newsstand with a diverse magazine selection, I happened upon a
premiere issue of _Editor & Writer_, "The Journal for Professional Feature
Editors & Writers," incorporating _Writing for Money_ and _Assignments_.
Intrigued, I picked it up.
Within the first 18 pages of a 64-page journal, I encountered no fewer than
three typos and a whole bunch of widow lines -- all true typographic errors
vs. spelling and grammar hiccups. (For example: an inverted apostrophe in a
contraction; a close quote sitting by itself on a line--located,
ironically, in a paragraph headed, "Partial quotes.")
These are the types of things that people pay me to find and fix, yet here
in a professional journal about commercial writing and editing I'm being
asked to pay $6.95 an issue for the most bush-league desktop publishing
I've seen outside amateur newsletters for little nonprofit clubs. The
introductory material, market info section, and one article I have read so
far are all excellent in terms of writing clarity, style, and content; but
I'm so IRRITATED by the typos that I'm reluctant to read any further. On
first browse I had considered springing for a subscription; now I'm
questioning the magazine's worth.
The real question is, Where do you draw the line?
Shouldn't a "journal through which top practitioners -- editors, writers
and educators -- help their colleagues master their craft" be a bit
better-produced for $6.95 an issue? I've paid a lot less than that for
top-end periodicals. Isn't an editor responsible for the typographic
quality of his/her publication?
Am I too unrealistic and demanding to expect this? Please contribute
opinions. I am quite riled up and find the viewpoints this list offers to
be helpful in sorting out my thoughts and attitudes. I will be
cross-posting this to the Copyediting list for the same purpose.
dcma -at- ct1 -dot- nai -dot- net