Re: Resumes and SMEs, Years v. Years'

Subject: Re: Resumes and SMEs, Years v. Years'
From: Joanna Sheldon <cjs10 -at- CORNELL -dot- EDU>
Date: Wed, 26 Feb 1997 19:22:29 -0500


>> I don't understand why you say the Chicago Manual says to use it "but
>> without any discussion." It explains quite clearly and categorically
>> that the apostrophe is used, and why.
>If you know what "old genitive case" means, perhaps it's clear. But
>it does not explicitly discuss why the apostrophe should not be
>omitted. Is there no alternative to the "old genitive case"? Why
>might some people mistakenly think there is? I assumed Chicago's
>ruling was of the same weight as "Use the serial comma/Don't use the
>serial comma".

Well, I do know what the old genitive case is, but that's neither here nor
there. The language is full of its own history. The lines, "It's important
that you (should) be on time" and "be they poets or dramatists" are
vestigial traces of the old subjunctive mood. Still makes fine modern
English. The old genitive shows up also in sentences like "His being here
has nothing to do with my mood" (the gerund requiring a possessive). We
never think twice about the history of the language, most of the time.
Maybe apostrophes give people trouble because they require a little


C. Joanna Sheldon, Ph.D. * GRAPHTECH Consulting
Graphics & Technical Writing

PO Box 4874, Ithaca NY 14852 USA
V: +1 607 533 8850 * F: +1 607 533 9092

cjs10 -at- cornell -dot- edu

TECHWR-L (Technical Communication) List Information: To send a message
to 2500+ readers, e-mail to TECHWR-L -at- LISTSERV -dot- OKSTATE -dot- EDU -dot- Send commands
Search the archives at or search and
browse the archives at

Previous by Author: Re: Blasted Apostrophes (Was Years v. Years')
Next by Author: Re: apostrophes (was Whose experience is it anyways??????)
Previous by Thread: Re: Resumes and SMEs, Years v. Years'
Next by Thread: Resumes and SMEs, Years v. Years'

What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:

Sponsored Ads

Sponsored Ads