Re[2]: Academic Pomposity

Subject: Re[2]: Academic Pomposity
From: Don Smith <dsmith -at- ACCESSBEYOND -dot- COM>
Date: Tue, 4 Mar 1997 12:56:29 EST

Susan Brown wrote, in part:

"I am continually amazed at the poor quality of academic writing. All
of the things we have learned to avoid like the plague (3rd person,
passive voice, convoluted sentence structure, excess verbiage)

Could it be, Susan (what I have always believed), that this is writing
designed to "snow" the reader with the writers vast knowledge of
either the subject or the writers vocabulary, or both. This kind of
writing is what brought me into the writing profession in the first
place. I wanted to try to take highly technical things and explain
them so that (almost) anyone could understand them. It is my
impression that academic types write in the opposite way, for an
opposite reason.


Don Smith

TECHWR-L (Technical Communication) List Information: To send a message
to 2500+ readers, e-mail to TECHWR-L -at- LISTSERV -dot- OKSTATE -dot- EDU -dot- Send commands
Search the archives at or search and
browse the archives at

Previous by Author: Re: Getting the programmers to come to you
Next by Author: Re[2]: CHAT: "Intercom" article
Previous by Thread: Re: Academic Pomposity
Next by Thread: Re: Academic Pomposity

What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:

Sponsored Ads

Sponsored Ads