Re: Academic Pomposity

Subject: Re: Academic Pomposity
From: "Wayne J. Douglass" <wayned -at- VERITY -dot- COM>
Date: Tue, 4 Mar 1997 12:46:04 -0800

At 02:02 PM 3/4/97 -0600, Paul J. Sisler wrote:
>Academic writing in technical communication is a genre, and it is rife with
>jargon specific to a narrow discipline. But when it does its job: it is
>intelligible to its audience (for the most part). It is *not* technical
>communication itself--it is academic communication about technical

When I first departed academic life for the tech writing game, I fantasized
about reading a paper at the Modern Language Association section on
Technical Writing that started, "Technical writing is a subliterary genre."

My attitude at the time was colored by my experience as a technical editor.
In those days, I toyed with the idea of adding a note to our copyright page
that read, "The prose style of this manual has been technically augmented to
simulate English."

--Wayne Douglass

Verity, Inc. Email: wayned -at- verity -dot- com
894 Ross Drive Telephone: 408-542-2139
Sunnyvale, CA 94089 Facsimile: 408-542-2040
Connecting People with Information:

TECHWR-L (Technical Communication) List Information: To send a message
to 2500+ readers, e-mail to TECHWR-L -at- LISTSERV -dot- OKSTATE -dot- EDU -dot- Send commands
Search the archives at or search and
browse the archives at

Previous by Author: Re: Is use of "(s)" allowed?
Next by Author: Re: Latin Phrases
Previous by Thread: Re: Academic Pomposity
Next by Thread: Re: Academic Pomposity

What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:

Sponsored Ads

Sponsored Ads