TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
Summary of thread: Academic writing meant for other academics is dense
because that's what they expect. The problem is that few can understand it
or stay awake through the attempt.
OK. If academics want to write that way to impress each other, I have no
problem with it. But I do remember, as a college student, having to wade
through the same kind of stuff. I recall, in particular, a sociology
textbook that was completely and utterly incomprehensible. Its author was
considered a leading light in the field, but I could never figure out why. I
guess his writing was so obscure that everyone figured he must be brilliant!
He may have been brilliant, but his textbook was useless, because his
brilliance was shielded by his writing.
thomas -dot- f -dot- remington -at- usa -dot- dupont -dot- com
Speaking for myself
NOTE: This e-mail note was perfect when it left my computer. Any errors or
typos are the result of faulty transmission, your computer, or your