TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
Convicted for using a non-academic language ? (was: Hot Topics)
Subject:Convicted for using a non-academic language ? (was: Hot Topics) From:"Peter Ring, PRC" <prc -at- PIP -dot- DKNET -dot- DK> Date:Mon, 10 Mar 1997 09:11:51 +1
At Sun, 9 Mar 1997 Tim Altom wrote:
> Here's a conundrum...I once read a hypothetical (I THINK it was a
> hypothetical) situation in which a manual was reduced literally to nothing
> more than a comic book without even thought balloons to interrupt the
> graphical approach. Then, when a user was hurt by not following the
> instructions closely, he/she sued on the basis that any instructions that
> look like a comic book can't reasonably expect to be taken seriously, hence
> is containing its own seeds for being ignored. In other words, the more
> infantile we make our instructions, the more a user should be expected to
> look at those instructions as Capain Marvel tripe and ignore them. Taken to
> an extreme, a manual done in High Latin in an illuminated manuscript would
> unconditionally shield the manufacturer from liability of having his manual
> ignored. So, presumably, would a manual laid out to look like a 1040-A.
Please note, that the opposite situation is just as possible: a law
suit - e.g. through a labour union - that a manual was written in
such an academic language that it was unreadable for the worker and
his/her foreman (or for a consumer) so that THIS was responsible for
Does ANYBODY know of ANY real law suit(s) following any of the
above cases and the result(s) of this/these law suits?
Greetings from Denmark
PRC (Peter Ring Consultants)
- specialists in user friendly manuals and audits on manuals.
prc -at- pip -dot- dknet -dot- dk http://www.pip.dknet.dk/~pip323/index.html
- the "User Friendly Manuals" website with links, bibliography, list
of prof. associations, and tips for technical writers.