TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
Re: Convicted for using a non-academic language ? (was: Hot Topics)
Subject:Re: Convicted for using a non-academic language ? (was: Hot Topics) From:"Susan W. Gallagher" <sgallagher -at- EXPERSOFT -dot- COM> Date:Mon, 10 Mar 1997 17:04:40 -0800
At 05:28 PM 3/10/97 -0700, Jay Mead wrote:
>There is a superb example of such a lawsuit, concerning the lack of
>clarity of a benefits package description--and as I remember the company
>lost the case (proving just how valuable we writers are)!
The one I've heard about (and it may be the same one, it may not) was
over a physician referral. The primary care physician referred the patient
to a non-plan-member doctor, and when the insurance company refused to
pay, the patient sued and won. The insurance policy merely said "referral
by primary care physician" and did not mention plan membership.
sgallagher -at- expersoft -dot- com
-- The _Guide_ is definitive.
Reality is frequently inaccurate.