Re: product lite

Subject: Re: product lite
From: O'NEILL Colin <CNE -at- EUROPAY -dot- COM>
Date: Tue, 11 Mar 1997 09:24:00 PST

>Tina Cipolla wrote:
>The general consensus around the office is that no one likes "lite" to
>follow the product name but we have yet to come up with anything better.

My first choice would have been "lite". As you don't like it, how about
"home" or something similar. It depends on who your "lite" market is!

>E-mail me unless you feel your response is of interest to the list as a
>whole.

If you want us to e-mail you then please include your e-mail address in
the body of the message.

Regards,

Colin O'Neill
Technical Writer

colin_one -at- compuserve -dot- com (home)
cne -at- europay -dot- com (work)

TECHWR-L (Technical Communication) List Information: To send a message
to 2500+ readers, e-mail to TECHWR-L -at- LISTSERV -dot- OKSTATE -dot- EDU -dot- Send commands
to LISTSERV -at- LISTSERV -dot- OKSTATE -dot- EDU (e.g. HELP or SIGNOFF TECHWR-L).
Search the archives at http://www.documentation.com/ or search and
browse the archives at http://listserv.okstate.edu/archives/techwr-l.html


Previous by Author: Re: Value added by technical documentation; counting blessings
Next by Author: Test Scripts for Telephony
Previous by Thread: Re: product lite
Next by Thread: Re: product lite


What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:

Sponsored Ads


Sponsored Ads