TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
Subject:Re: Printing Process (long question) From:Len Olszewski <saslpo -at- UNX -dot- SAS -dot- COM> Date:Tue, 11 Mar 1997 14:18:50 GMT
In article <3324DAFF -dot- 2E78 -at- erols -dot- com>, "Andrea G. Kenner" <agkenner -at- EROLS -dot- COM>
|> We produce five 100-page manuals in Word 6.
|> We worked with a printing vendor who advised us to convert our documents
|> to PageMaker and then to a PostScript file that could be imported into
|> their printing system.
Everything is a trade-off. Systems with a higher degree of reliability
and robustness are typically less user-friendly (there are exceptions).
You ought to explore technology which lets you keep your authoring easy,
but which can produce a PostScript output stream (PostScript level 2, if
you want color). Whether PageMaker is the way you want to go, or to some
other technology, You need a PostScript output at the back end. This is
the industrial strength printer language you need to scale your process
up. You can be in a position to format your books to a DAT tape, and
then your options for finding compatible print vendors will explode.
If you are tied to Word, this will always be a problem for you. Not
knowing your other requirements, I'm not sure what else to advise.
Hope this is useful.
Len Olszewski My opinions; you go get your own.
saslpo -at- unx -dot- sas -dot- com