Re: product lite

Subject: Re: product lite
From: Ginna Watts <gwatts -at- PIM -dot- BC -dot- CA>
Date: Tue, 11 Mar 1997 14:34:10 -0800

You wrote:
>Tina Cipolla[SMTP:tcipolla -at- ACCUSOFT -dot- COM] wrote:
>My company is planning to release a light version of one of our
>products. Basically it is going to be the original product minus a
>bunch of features; the advantage being that it will be sold at a
>reasonable price for the average consumer. (Our regular market is
>developers.) We are having trouble coming up with a name for the thing.
> Almost every word I can come up with that could be used after the
>product name has a negative connotation, which we don't want
><snip>

How about 'XX for Small Business' (or some such)?
Or
XX Core Package (implying that they could move up to the 'extended' version
- the full one.)

Ginna

Ginna Watts - Technical Writer
Pacific International Mapping Corp.
gwatts -at- pim -dot- bc -dot- ca

TECHWR-L (Technical Communication) List Information: To send a message
to 2500+ readers, e-mail to TECHWR-L -at- LISTSERV -dot- OKSTATE -dot- EDU -dot- Send commands
to LISTSERV -at- LISTSERV -dot- OKSTATE -dot- EDU (e.g. HELP or SIGNOFF TECHWR-L).
Search the archives at http://www.documentation.com/ or search and
browse the archives at http://listserv.okstate.edu/archives/techwr-l.html


Previous by Author: Binders vs. Books
Next by Author: Re: Getting the programmers to come to you
Previous by Thread: Re: product lite
Next by Thread: Re: Convicted for using a non-academic language ? (was: Hot Topics)


What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:

Sponsored Ads


Sponsored Ads