Re: Engineers and Writers

Subject: Re: Engineers and Writers
From: Paula Puffer <techwrtr -at- CEI -dot- NET>
Date: Sat, 15 Mar 1997 14:19:56 -0600

<snip>
Mike and Mike wrote:
>
>> Writing for us is functional, not artistic. The artistic side to
>> writing may be more suitable for other fields of writing.
>
>I don't think you can separate the two. There are plenty of rule-book
>toting dillettantes around who think they can write. Good writing,
>technical or otherwise, always has an artistic side to it.

I agree with Mike Dannenberg when he states that you can't seperate the two.
ON the flip side of what he said, good writing, technical or otherwise also
has a technical side to it. It has to or it wouldn't be believable.

Paula

*******************************************************************
Paula Puffer
techwrtr -at- cei -dot- net
Thesis Project: The UWC Online http://www.ualr.edu/~owl/index.html
Class Web page: RHET 1312 http://www.ualr.edu/~papuffer/comp2.html

TECHWR-L (Technical Communication) List Information: To send a message
to 2500+ readers, e-mail to TECHWR-L -at- LISTSERV -dot- OKSTATE -dot- EDU -dot- Send commands
to LISTSERV -at- LISTSERV -dot- OKSTATE -dot- EDU (e.g. HELP or SIGNOFF TECHWR-L).
Search the archives at http://www.documentation.com/ or search and
browse the archives at http://listserv.okstate.edu/archives/techwr-l.html


Previous by Author: Re: Academic Pomposity
Next by Author: Re: Creativity in Technical Communications
Previous by Thread: Re: Engineers and Writers
Next by Thread: suggestions for employee manual


What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:

Sponsored Ads


Sponsored Ads