Re: Slamming Coda -- two closing thoughts

Subject: Re: Slamming Coda -- two closing thoughts
From: "Walker, Arlen P" <Arlen -dot- P -dot- Walker -at- JCI -dot- COM>
Date: Fri, 28 Mar 1997 09:23:28 -0500

If someone
posts something that's "wrong", do NOT immediately
post a correction. Read the rest of the mail from the
list, wait a couple of hours, then, if no other posts
with essentially the same content have appeared,
THEN post your correction.

I read this, and the first thought that came into my head is that it can
only work if someone on the list doesn't follow this suggestion. Think
about it: if everyone follows that suggestion, all it succeeds in doing is
postponing the batch of correcting messages by a couple of hours. ;{>}

OK, so who gets to choose the person who fires first?


Have fun,
Arlen
Chief Managing Director In Charge, Department of Redundancy Department
DNRC 224

Arlen -dot- P -dot- Walker -at- JCI -dot- Com
----------------------------------------------
In God we trust; all others must provide data.
----------------------------------------------
Opinions expressed are mine and mine alone.
If JCI had an opinion on this, they'd hire someone else to deliver it.

TECHWR-L (Technical Communication) List Information: To send a message
to 2500+ readers, e-mail to TECHWR-L -at- LISTSERV -dot- OKSTATE -dot- EDU -dot- Send commands
to LISTSERV -at- LISTSERV -dot- OKSTATE -dot- EDU (e.g. HELP or SIGNOFF TECHWR-L).
Search the archives at http://www.documentation.com/ or search and
browse the archives at http://listserv.okstate.edu/archives/techwr-l.html


Previous by Author: Re: Slamming
Next by Author: Re: Technical adj. stack question
Previous by Thread: Slamming Coda -- two closing thoughts
Next by Thread: Re: Slamming Coda -- two closing thoughts


What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:

Sponsored Ads


Sponsored Ads