TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
Subject:Re: Creativity and Technical Communication From:Stuart Burnfield <slb -at- FS -dot- COM -dot- AU> Date:Sun, 30 Mar 1997 01:22:41 +0800
"Mark L. Levinson" <mark -at- MEMCO -dot- CO -dot- IL> said:
> "Creativity" is a misleading word. It sounds as if it means making
> a new thing, whereas psychologists tell us that creativity consists
> essentially of finding new connections between existing things. (So,
> for that matter, does a lot of humor.)
> But for the most part, the solutions to technical-writing problems
> are not particularly creative, they're just elegant.
Yes! 'Elegant' is probably a better word for many of the solutions we
think of as 'creative'.
For example, I might try several creative approaches to rewriting or
reorganising a difficult chapter. Instead, the best solution might be to
redesign the software: merge two screens, remove/rename/rearrange some
fields. If the product is designed well, I might even be able to do away
with the chapter entirely.
This is certainly not creative writing, or indeed any sort of writing.
It is, I think, elegant technical communication. I'm never very
interested in the "What do we call ourselves?" threads on techwr-l, but
this example highlights for me the difference between technical writing
and technical communication. If the product can speak for itself without
having to rely on a mouthpiece or interpreter, that's a triumph of
technical communication and a job well done.
> The downside
> of creativity is that personalizes your writing. You can get away
> with sounding like a distinct individual if you're writing a third-
> party manual like a "for Dummies," but not if you're supposed to
> be the definitive voice of a technically-oriented corporation.
Surely writing can have a clear voice without it being the writer's
personal voice. When I write a good page in a software manual it doesn't
sound like me talking. When I write a bad page it doesn't sound like
*anyone* talking, except perhaps Al Gore.
> If the customer of the Veeblefetzer receives a book that reads like
> "Joey's Take on Using the Veeblefetzer," then the customer thinks
> uneasily, "Would someone else have told me something else? Something
It should be like dealing with someone competent, friendly and helpful
at the hardware shop. I wouldn't distrust the advice merely because the
person's style is distinctive and personal.