TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
Subject:PC Processing Power (was Home Alone) From:Alexander Von_obert <avobert -at- TWH -dot- MSN -dot- SUB -dot- ORG> Date:Wed, 2 Apr 1997 11:36:04 +0100
* Antwort auf eine Nachricht von kjolberg -at- IX -dot- NETCOM -dot- COM an All am 28.03.97
kk> From: "Kristine J. Olberg" <kjolberg -at- IX -dot- NETCOM -dot- COM>
kk> Ron, I use a Pentium 100 MHz with 16MB RAM. I run some pretty
kk> high powered
kk> apps on my machine, and I think I don't begin to touch the
kk> processing power of the CPU.
I use a 90 MHz Pentium and examined my choices. I think I would hardly feel
any improvement from anything below a 200 MHz MMX CPU. But other, cheaper
improvements might have a tremendous effect:
kk> I've maxed
kk> out a 1.2GB hard drive and the disk I/O seems very slow. I also
kk> run up against RAM shortages once in awhile.
Up to now my Win 3.11 installation is stored on my Netware 3.11 server. But in
recent years disk drives got much faster than the 1 MB/s maxiumum of 10 Mb/s
Ethernet. More RAM might even help while you not get any real shortage.