TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
> I am considering taking a speed reading course. As you know, our work
> involves reading a great deal of technical material, and I believe that the
> improved efficiency and retention such courses promise would be very helpful.
> I'd appreciate any of you who have done this telling me about your
Earl, do you need to edit as well as write? If so, you might do
yourself more harm than good with a speed-reading course.
I've never taken one, but such courses have been introduced in other
seminars that I've taken. I've listened attentively to the
introductions and decided that the "reading for concepts" approach
is OK for managers, but bad if you need to edit.
PARIS IN THE
and others like it? People miss errors such as this because they
are looking for concepts. This would kill an editor or a writer
who is expected to self-edit.
My 2 cents,
LaVonna F. Funkhouser lffunkhouser -at- halnet -dot- com
COREComm Webmaster webmaster -at- corecomm -dot- com