Re: RFC1983 (Was E-mail or e-mail)

Subject: Re: RFC1983 (Was E-mail or e-mail)
From: "Parks, Beverly" <ParksB -at- EMH1 -dot- HQISEC -dot- ARMY -dot- MIL>
Date: Wed, 30 Apr 1997 13:16:24 -0700

>>It is always easy to zero in on the exceptions to make a point, if that
>>is what you believe. To each his own. I shall prevail.
>>Yeah? You and what Army? (-:

LOL! (Actually, the Army prefers E-mail. They are sorely misguided.)
>>>Hey, did anybody see the xfiles the other night? BWA-Ha-Ha-Ha-HA!
>>Good point. See the Fox website:
Actually, I did look at the Fox site before making that comment to make
sure that the cap-hyphen was there in X-Files! Woulda been a weak joke,

>(and note that they say "E-mail" (cap E, hyphen). Thanks, Bev.

>Oh, yeah. Now THERE'S an authority. How much farther can you reach? 8-)

P.S. I know this topic is probably stretching Eric's patience, so I'm
not going to post much on it after this, unless I have something new to
contribute. I'll be happy to answer mail privately, though.

TECHWR-L (Technical Communication) List Information: To send a message
to 2500+ readers, e-mail to TECHWR-L -at- LISTSERV -dot- OKSTATE -dot- EDU -dot- Send commands
Search the archives at or search and
browse the archives at

Previous by Author: Re: RFC1983 (Was E-mail or e-mail)
Next by Author: Standardization for non-documentation documents
Previous by Thread: Re: RFC1983 (Was E-mail or e-mail)
Next by Thread: Re: RFC1983 (Was E-mail or e-mail)

What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:

Sponsored Ads