Re: FrameMaker Indexing

Subject: Re: FrameMaker Indexing
From: Lori Smith <lasmith -at- IQUEST -dot- NET>
Date: Wed, 30 Apr 1997 23:28:03 -0500

Dennis Hays wrote:
>
> FrameMaker's view of the world, as to indexing, is somewhat archaic. That
> the user is forced to "mark" each occurrence of a word, is quite time
> consuming and also boring. Other than Frame's ability to create "leveled'
> index categories, this indexing method is not the best.
>
There is a plug-in product for Frame I found in an STC mag called IX:gen
(?) I have not used it myself, but we have it in our office and are
expeciting to purchase it for all writers who wish to do their own
indexing. I don't know much about the features off hand, but I think it
will add back some of the ones lost in Word and WP.

Lori Smith
lasmith -at- iquest -dot- net

TECHWR-L (Technical Communication) List Information: To send a message
to 2500+ readers, e-mail to TECHWR-L -at- LISTSERV -dot- OKSTATE -dot- EDU -dot- Send commands
to LISTSERV -at- LISTSERV -dot- OKSTATE -dot- EDU (e.g. HELP or SIGNOFF TECHWR-L).
Search the archives at http://www.documentation.com/ or search and
browse the archives at http://listserv.okstate.edu/archives/techwr-l.html


Previous by Author: Re: "Wilcox, John (Contractor)" <wilcoxj -at- WDNI -dot- COM> Developer wants to take over documentation 4/29/97 Read 280992932
Next by Author: Keyboard Art
Previous by Thread: Re: FrameMaker Indexing
Next by Thread: Re: Devr. wants to take over doc.--long response


What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:

Sponsored Ads


Sponsored Ads