TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
Subject:Re: Bad Employers/Clients List??? From:Susan Brown <sbrown -at- JSCSYS -dot- COM> Date:Fri, 2 May 1997 11:08:18 -0500
I think there are a couple of things we should think about.
My first question was 'Is this a public or a private forum?'. My
first thought is private: we restrict (by requiring a subscription and by
enforcing our own rules) access to this list. People who don't subsscribe,
or don't follow the rules cannot be a member. Sort of a private club, with
low annual dues and initiation fees (if you don't count the work we had to
do to get to our current positions). I am not sure how the lawyers would
come down on this, but I feel fairly confident that my feelings on this are
close to being right. This means that anything wirtten on this kind of a
list would not be a public publishing, but an internal discussion in a
private club. (I stand ready to be flamed/argued with/condemned on this.)
The second question was 'How would we do this?'. The manner of
presentation could mean the difference between trouble or no trouble. I
think we get ourselves into a bit of trouble by maintaing a 'black list'.
Why not just a list? Good and Bad. This way we are not colouring the
presentation (Only submit if you have something bad to say), but are
offering a broader service: 'everything you needed to know about ...',
rather than 'why you should avoid ...'.
Third question was "Would there be contribution guidelines?'. This
can also make a big difference. For example, 'For the 8 months I was working
with Firm X, they were consistently 6 - 8 weeks behind in paying my
invoices.' not 'Firm X are just a bunch of deabeats!!', or 'I hear Firm X
never pays their bills on time.' Guidelines for submissions could include
and standardized checklist people submitting could rate things (like working
environment, cooperation, timeliness in paying) on a scale of 1 to 10.,
experiences must be your own and not a friend's, etc. etc. I'm sure you get
This is my first cut on this, but I basically think it could be a
good idea. Making it useful would be a lot of work, though.