TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
Subject:Re: Looking for words From:Len Olszewski <saslpo -at- UNX -dot- SAS -dot- COM> Date:Tue, 6 May 1997 20:17:57 GMT
In article <8625648F:006BC57C -dot- 00 -at- gpsnotes8 -dot- gps -dot- com>, RJACOBSE -at- gps -dot- com writes:
|> I'm looking for alternatives to the words "parent" and "child" to describe
|> entities in a outline-like conceptual structure. One alternative for
|> "child" is "dependent," but I can't think of an easily aprehended analog
|> for "parent."
|> Is parent/child good enough, or are we overlooking some obvious
"Main" and "subordinate" seem to work here. You could try "primary" and
"subordinate", or if you need other levels, "primary", "secondary",
"tertiary", and so forth.
You might consider a containment metaphor, where the parent elements
would be "exterior", and the child elements "interior" with the notion
of "peer" elements at some given level of containment.
Hope this helps.
Len O. "I would rather be cynically accurate than
saslpo -at- unx -dot- sas -dot- com inoffensively euphemistic." - Me
***Opinions you see here? Mine, all mine.***********************