TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
Subject:Re: Numbered Heradings in Word From:JIMCHEVAL -at- AOL -dot- COM Date:Wed, 7 May 1997 18:27:07 -0400
In a message dated 97-05-07 14:19:28 EDT, sbrown -at- JSCSYS -dot- COM (Susan Brown)
<< We want headings for our current document in the form:
Section 1.0: Introdution
1.2: More text
Section 2.0: Still more text
2.1: Yet again more text
You didn't say what product you're doing this in. If it's Word, you could
assign the appropriate heading style (Heading 1, Heading 2) to each level,
then format it further using the 'Heading Styles' option under the FORMAT
Or, for somewhat more control (but with more effort) you can use sequence
fields [SEQ item_name]. So you'd create one sequence using the label (for
example) 'Section', another for labelled 'Sub-section'.
There are all kinds of nuances to this (described in Help) and I don't want
to go too deep into it if you're not in fact using Word. If you are,
somewhere I have a guide to these I wrote up for a project. I can dig it out
and forward it to you.
Also, just organizationally, I don't believe you need the '.0' for the top
levels. I'd put:
1.2 More text
1.2.a notes about more text
1.2.b more notes
With 'Show Field Codes' switched on, this would look something like:
'\c' picks up the value of the last SEQ field with the same label without
incrementing it. There's another parameter to make the result come out
alphabetically (for the third level), but I can't remember it off-hand.
If the document is not going to be maintained by professional TW's, you might
just go ahead and use manually typed numbers. It's more laborious, but more