Re: 7 plus or minus 2

Subject: Re: 7 plus or minus 2
From: Stuart Burnfield <slb -at- FS -dot- COM -dot- AU>
Date: Tue, 29 Jul 1997 23:35:35 +0800

Pat, you've lost me.

> > The documentation's purpose and form, the information's complexity and
> > depth, and the audience's knowledge and experience are all far more
> > important than Miller's 7+/-2 research in deciding how long a list
> > should be.
[snip...]

> Exactly! Audience, audience, audience! Wonderful post.

So you're agreeing that there's no magic number -- it all depends on
the audience, purpose of docs, etc.

> I keep my bullets to no more than 5.

But if there's no magic number, why follow an arbitrary limit of five
items, regardless of audience, purpose. . .?

Regards
---
Stuart Burnfield
Functional Software Pty Ltd
mailto:slb -at- fs -dot- com -dot- au

TECHWR-L (Technical Communication) List Information: To send a message
to 2500+ readers, e-mail to TECHWR-L -at- LISTSERV -dot- OKSTATE -dot- EDU -dot- Send commands
to LISTSERV -at- LISTSERV -dot- OKSTATE -dot- EDU (e.g. HELP or SIGNOFF TECHWR-L).
Search the archives at http://www.documentation.com/ or search and
browse the archives at http://listserv.okstate.edu/archives/techwr-l.html


Previous by Author: Re: Which computer for a contractor?
Next by Author: Manual sizes
Previous by Thread: Re: 7 plus or minus 2
Next by Thread: Re: 7 plus or minus 2


What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:


Sponsored Ads