TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
Subject:Re: HTML editor recommendations From:Paul Fussell <pfussell -at- FORTE -dot- COM> Date:Mon, 4 Aug 1997 19:23:19 -0700
>>>At 12:30 AM -0700 8/4/97, A Watkins wrote:
>Last week, I asked for recommendations for HTML editors and for
>converters from both Frame and Word.
>I read the responses very carefully; some replies talked about
>experience with different programs
>but no recommendations. There was interest in the results, so
>here they are . . .
>the clear-cut winner is HomeSite - with 7 votes
>second choice=MS FrontPage - with 4 votes for and 1 against
HomeSite 2.5 [PC]
HoTMetaL Pro 3.0 [PC/Mac/Unix]
Web-It 2.2 [PC]
HotDog Pro 3.0 [PC]
WebEdit Pro 2.0 [PC]
BBEdit 4.0.4 [Mac]
Alpha 6.5 [Mac]
They said that they didn't include pure wysiwyg editors because they
weren't sufficiently full-featured, and that if you're interested in
management, to check out higher-end products like Microsoft's FrontPage,
NetObjects Fusion, and Corel's WebMaster Suite.
Editors and word processors are such a personal thing, it's hard to know if
a reviewer is testing for the same things you find important. In addition,
familiarity with the way an editor works can continue to make it easier for
you to use, even though another product might be preferable if you're
starting from scratch. With all that in mind, their recommendation was
WebEdit Pro. Their take on HomeSite was that it was a great deal when it
was cheaper, but now that it costs $79, there are better alternatives
available at that price.