Re: Query: stuffed/zipped generic term

Subject: Re: Query: stuffed/zipped generic term
From: Buck Buchanan <buck -dot- buchanan -at- CITICORP -dot- COM>
Date: Thu, 7 Aug 1997 05:59:43 -0700

> Archived. Been using this term successfully in user docs for years.
Perhaps incorrectly, then.

It does not necessarily mean smaller than original (as tarred, stuffed,
zipped, compressed do).

IMHO
--
Buck Buchanan
Software Documentation
Citicorp Technology Center
Westlake, Texas
Speaking for me, not for them!

buck -dot- buchanan -at- citicorp -dot- com
Home: writer -at- wf -dot- net

TECHWR-L (Technical Communication) List Information: To send a message
to 2500+ readers, e-mail to TECHWR-L -at- LISTSERV -dot- OKSTATE -dot- EDU -dot- Send commands
to LISTSERV -at- LISTSERV -dot- OKSTATE -dot- EDU (e.g. HELP or SIGNOFF TECHWR-L).
Search the archives at http://www.documentation.com/ or search and
browse the archives at http://listserv.okstate.edu/archives/techwr-l.html


Previous by Author: Re: Anthropomorphic Phrases
Next by Author: academispeak
Previous by Thread: Re: Query: stuffed/zipped generic term
Next by Thread: Re[2]: Query: stuffed/zipped generic term


What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:


Sponsored Ads